Articles Posted in Car Accidents

Earlier this month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) issued a press release discussing an analysis of the Administration’s 2012 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (“FARS”) showing that the number of deaths occurring from U.S. highway accidents increased from 2011 to 2012.

According to the numbers, highway traffic fatalities increased a little over three percent (3.3%) from 32,479 in 2011 to 33,561 in 2012. Almost three-quarters (72%) of the increase occurred in the three months of the year and mostly involved motorcyclists and pedestrians. Unfortunately, the increase marks a reverse in the recent downward trend in highway fatalities, which have been decreasing since 2005, and have remained at historic lows for the last five years. 2011 deaths were the lowest number since 1949.

NHTSA has estimated that fatalities for the first half of 2013 will be lower than those that occurred during the same time period in 2012. NHTSA maintains that, although motorists spent a similar amount time on the road in 2011 and 2012, the following statistics demonstrate a disturbing problem with the safety of America’s roadways: The fatality rate for occupants of large-trucks went up 8.9% from 2011, an increase for the third consecutive year.

Recently, in support of its designation of November 10-17 as National Drowsy Driving Prevention Week, the AAA Foundation For Traffic Safety (“AAA”) released the results of a survey of drivers across the country regarding their perspective on on drowsy driving, as part of National Drowsy Driving Prevention Week (Nov 10-16). According to AAA, the goal of the survey is to “foster a social climate in which traffic safety is highly valued and rigorously pursued. The results of the survey show that, although most drivers condemned drowsy driving, more than a quarter admitted to doing it anyway.

Almost all the individuals surveyed, (94.9%) stated their belief that it was somewhat or completely unacceptable to drive when so sleepy they have trouble keeping their eyes open. 82.9% of respondents felt that drowsy drivers pose a somewhat or very serious threat to personal safety

The numbers compiled by AAA demonstrate the severity of the drowsy driving problem in America. According to AAA statistics, 16.5% of fatal crashes, 13.1% of crashes resulting in hospitalization, and 7% of crashes in which a passenger vehicle is towed involved a drowsy driver.

According to a recent story published by the Herald Tribune last month, two people were seriously injured on October 9, 2013, in a motorcycle crash that required authorities to shut down the southbound lanes of U.S. Interstate 75 near mile marker 193 in Venice, Florida. The Florida Highway Patrol concluded that the crash occurred at approximately 6:00 pm when a 2012 Toyota Camry heading southbound in the center lane of I-75 failed to notice a 1994 Honda VXR motorcycle slowing in front of him and rear-ended the rider and his passenger.

The impact of the collision caused the motorcycle to become trapped under the car, which continued forward for another 400 feet. Both the motorcycle driver and passenger suffered critical injuries in the accident and were helicoptered to Blake Medical Center in Bradenton for treatment. The driver of the Camry was cited for careless driving, presumably under Section 316.1925 of the Florida Statutes which requires motorists to drive in a “careful and prudent manner…so as not to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person.”

As this blog has discussed before, motorcycle accidents are particularly dangerous due to the limited amount of protection they provide to riders compared to more traditional modes of transportation such as cars and trucks. Motorcycles are also far less visible in traffic than cars, resulting in an increased risk accident. One report concluded that the risk of a motorcyclists’ likelihood of being killed in a traffic accident is sixteen times that of the driver of an automobile.

Late last month, ABC Action News reported that two children and their father had been rescued from a vehicle overturned in a St. Petersburg, Florida canal following a motor vehicle accident.

According to St. Petersburg police, the car in which the children were passengers ended up in the canal as the result of a chain reaction collision involving several other vehicles. The victim’s silver sedan was at front of a line of cars of parents waiting to pick up their children from Sawgrass Elementary School. The driver of a gold Chevy Tahoe accelerated into the rear of the row of cars which then pushed the sedan into the water. Police are still investigating the incident but the driver of the Tahoe has been determined to be at fault and charges are pending.Under certain circumstances, speeding in Florida constitutes a special form of negligence known as “per se” negligence. Normally, Florida law allows individuals to recover for injuries suffered as the result of the negligence of another when the victim is able to show that the offender failed to exercise “ordinary care” in their course of conduct. To prove a claim for negligence, the plaintiff must prove three elements:

  • The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty to exercise ordinary care.

Back in March, this blog discussed the Florida Senate’s approval of Senate Bill 52 (“Bill 52”), that sought to impose a statewide ban on texting while driving. On October 1, 2013, Bill 52, renamed “Florida Ban on Texting While Driving Law”, became effective. Florida’s texting ban makes it the forty-first state to adopt such prohibitions on the use of cellphones while driving. The State of Maryland also adopted a similar texting ban on October 1 of this year.

The new measure outlaws texting by motorists, but exempts police and other emergency vehicles. Texting while driving is considered a secondary offense, meaning that police can cite drivers for texting only if they have been stopped for another traffic violation such as speeding. A first violation of the law results in a $30 fine, however, if the texting causes a motor vehicle accident, the offender will also be assessed six points on his driver’s license.

Some proponents of anti-texting laws have criticized the measure for including too many exceptions and exemptions. For example, motorists are still permitted to use their cell phones when stopped red lights or stop signs and when moving, to perform certain tasks such as checking GPS and getting directions. Drivers can also send a text message to report the commission of a crime.Further, the law allows drivers to read text messages as long as they contain address information or directions. Detractors of the law contend that this allows anyone cited for texting while driving to excuse their behavior by claiming they were looking at a map or checking directions.

Early this month, a young couple, Rob Lemon, 25, and Hilary Michalak, 25, were struck by a motorist while riding their tandem bike on the Memorial Causeway in Clearwater, Florida. According to reports, the force of the impact shattered the bike and threw the pair over 50 feet. Although both individuals were wearing helmets, Lemon later died at St. Joseph’s Hospital in Tampa and Michalak fell into in a coma.

The vehicle that struck Lemon and Michalak did not stop, however, two days after the incident, Christopher Patrick Weed, 29, of Clearwater, came forward and admitted he may have been involved. According to police, Weed claimed that he had blacked out on the way home from and didn’t remember hitting anyone.Upon seeing news coverage of the incident, Weed went to police, who later discovered Weed’s vehicle had a missing windshield and damage to the front end. Weed was arrested on two felony charges of leaving the scene of a crash.

According to those close to the victims, both were aware of the danger posed by bicycling on Florida’s roadways. Both Lemon and Michalak always wore helmets and usually rode their bike on trails to avoid the dangers posed by traffic. Lemon also wore an anklet engraved with his father’s name and phone number so that he could be identified and family contacted if he was ever seriously injured.

Last month, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, issued a decision in the case of Seybold v. Clapis, discussing the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress as it relates to car accident claims. In Seybold, the plaintiffs, Mandy Seybold, John Seybold, and their two children, were preparing to leave the Disney All-Star Movie Resort. John Seybold was in the hotel checking out as Mandy Seybold waited near their vehicle containing the children. As Mandy and the children waited, Mandy was struck by a car driven by the defendant, Victor Clapis. Hearing his wife scream, John Seybold went outside to find Mandy Seybold’s pinned between the vehicles. Clapis put his car into park, leaving Mandy Seybold pinned. A bystander moved the Seybold’s vehicle, freeing Mandy Seybold’s leg. Although the incident took place on Walt Disney’s property, no Disney employees came to assist Mandy Seybold.

The Seybolds sued both Clapis and Disney, allege claims on behalf of John Seybold and the children against Disney for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Disney moved to dismiss these claims, arguing that the Seybolds would not be able to prove the elements of a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Under Florida law, the elements necessary to prove a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress differ depending on whether or not the plaintiff suffered a physical impact from an external force. If the plaintiff has suffered an impact, he or she may recover for emotional distress resulting from the incident during which the impact occurred.

A driver lost control while speeding on I-95 and crashed into a wall. The accident, which left six people injured, happened late on Sep. 1, 2013, resulting in the closure of all southbound lanes at exit 103. Florida Highway Patrol proceeded to investigate the incident.

According to CBS Miami, a black Nissan carrying four people was travelling at high speeds when the 21-year-old driver lost control and crashed the vehicle into a guardrail, another wall and finally a second car. The impact of hitting the wall resulted in two of the four people being ejected from the vehicle, one of whom was the driver. They were taken to Ryder Trauma Centre. The driver and one passenger were listed in critical condition, and the other two passengers had severe but stable injuries.

The two people travelling in the second car also were injured. The vehicle was struck as the Nissan spun out after rebounding off the wall. Fortunately, their injuries were minor and were treated on the scene by Miami-Dade Fire Rescue.

According to a recent press release published by the AAA Foundation For Traffic Safety (“Foundation”), an increasing number of American teenagers are delaying getting a driver’s license until their eighteenth birthday. The report estimates that half of teens obtain their license within twelve months of their respective state’s minimum age and only fifty-four percent become licensed before their eighteenth birthday. These numbers are in stark contract to twenty years ago when more than two-thirds of teens were licensed by their eighteenth birthday.

According to some safety experts, the delay in licensing is cause for concern as these teen drivers do not have to complete graduated drivers licensing (“GDL”) programs. GDL programs are designed to gradually introduce teens to driving by phasing in different driving privileges over time, such as:

Minimum age of sixteen to obtain a learner’s permit.

Miami Dade Community College was the site of a deadly car crash, and subsequent fire which left one person dead and several others seriously injured. The site of the incident was 6300 NW 7th Ave, the Liberty City Campus for Miami Dade College. As a silver vehicle spun out of control yesterday, it made its way into the Carrie P. Meek Entrepreneurial Education Center. Almost immediately, the silver car caught on fire and dramatically went up in smoke. Onlookers nearly lost their lives, while waiting for the bus close to the accident scene.

According to witnesses, the car, a silver Lincoln, was going so fast that the driver was unable to gain control of the car before crashing into the building, hitting several innocent victims. One individual has been pronounced dead and others were transported to Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital. This hit and run accident, resulted in the driver fleeing the scene of the crime, initially, but he was later caught by police and taken to the hospital, as well.

Car accident attorneys at Gerson & Schwartz, PA have over forty years of experience handling personal injury cases where catastrophic injuries or death are the unfortunate result of driver negligence. Especially, in a case where there is a hit and run, qualified professional lawyers are critical for a fair outcome for victims or their families. Attorney’s fees are never paid until a case has been settled or tried in court and won on behalf of innocent victims. Proper protocol with insurance companies and responsible parties for an accident are followed precisely according to the legal guidelines defined by the state, whenever Gerson & Schwartz is handling a case.

Contact Information